LastestNews http://www.biblereexamined.com/wiki/tiki-wiki_rss.php?ver=2 Sun, 20 May 2012 07:28:52 +0100 Tiki CMS/Groupware via FeedCreator 1.7.2.1 http://www.biblereexamined.com/wiki/img/tiki/tikilogo.png Romans Wiki http://www.biblereexamined.com/wiki/tiki-index.php en-us Message Center http://www.biblereexamined.com/wiki/tiki-index.php?page=Message+Center .diffchar { color:red; } - A few years ago I'd have to pay smoonee for this information.
+ I can already tell that's gonna be super hpelful.
]]> Thu, 03 Nov 2011 20:59:18 +0100 Rom03_Issues http://www.biblereexamined.com/wiki/tiki-index.php?page=Rom03_Issues .diffchar { color:red; } -
  • Debate on Pistis Christou-
  • Rom 3:31 faith establishes the Law-
  • William Newell-
  • First Admin's View+
    + Against Richard B. Hays's 'Faith of Jesus Christ'
    + Jae Hyun Lee
    + JGRChJ. vol. 5. 2008. 1732.
    +
    + The Rhetoric of pistis in Paul: Galatians 2.16, 3.22, Romans 3.22, and Philippians 3.9
    + R Barry Matlock
    + Journal for the Study of the New Testament. pp. 173-203. vol. 30. 2007. 2637.
    +  
    + The Faith of Jesus Christ
    + Richard B. Hays
    + 2002. 2205.
    +
    + The 'Faith of Christ' in Current Discussion
    + Pollard, P
    + ConcJourn? 23,1997, 213-28
    + False Presuppositions in the Pistis Christou Debate: A Response to Brian Dodd
    + Douglas A. Campbell
    + JournBibLit? 116. pp. 713-19. 1997. 1621.
    +  
    + PISTIS and Pauline Christology: What Is at Stake?
    + Richard B. Hays
    + Pauline Theology, Volume 4: Looking Back, Pressing On. E. E. Johnson ; D. M.Hay (Eds.). 1997. 1186.
    +
    + The 'Faith of Christ' in Current Discussion
    + P. Pollard
    + ConcJourn?. pp. 213-228. vol. 23. 1997. 1672.
    +  
    + Romans 1:17--A Crux Interpretum for the Pistis Christou Debate?
    + Brian Dodd
    + JBL. pp. 470-73. vol. 114no. 3. 1995. 2568.
    +  
    + Romans 1:17--A Crux Interpretum for Pistis Christou Debate
    + Douglas A. Campbell
    + Journal of Biblical Literature (Summer). pp. 265-285. vol. 113. 1994. 1786.
    +
    + The Obedience of Faith in the Letter to the Romans: Part III(b): The Obedience of Christ and the Obedience of the Christian
    + Don B. Garlington
    + Westminster Theological Journal. pp. 281-97. vol. 55. 1993.
    +
    + The Obedience of Faith in the Letter to the Romans: Part III: The Obedience of Christ and the Obedience of the Christian
    + Don B. Garlington
    + Westminster Theological Journal . pp. 87-112. vol. 55. 1993. 702.
    +  
    + Once More Pistis Christou
    + James D. G. Dunn
    + Society of Biblical Literature 1991 Seminar Papers. ed. E. Lovering (Eds.). pp. 714-744. 1991. 1736.
    +  
    + PISTIS CHRISTOU
    + Morna D. Hooker
    + NST. vol. 35. 1989. 1724.
    +  
    + Again Pistis Christou
    + Sam K. Williams
    + CBQ. pp. 431-47. vol. 49. 1987. 1725.
    +
    + The Faith of Jesus Christ: An Investigation of the Narrative Substructure of Galatians 3:1-4:11
    + Richard B. Hays
    + SBLDS 56.. 1983. 1308.
    +  
    + The Pistis Christou Formulation in Paul
    + Arlen Hultgren
    + NovT 22 (1980). 1980. 1728.
    +  
    + Pistis in Romans
    + John J O'Rourke
    + CBQ 35. 1973. 1669.
    +
    + Faith of Jesus Christ – A New Testament Debate
    + D. W. B. Robinson
    + RTR. pp. 71-81. vol. 29. 1970. 2197.
    +  
    + On the 'Faith of Christ'
    + George Howard
    + HTR 60 (1967) . 1967. 1727.
    +  
    + Pistis Iesu Christou bei Paulus
    + G. Kittel
    + TSK. pp. 419-39. vol. 79. 1899.
    +
    +
    ]]> Thu, 28 Apr 2011 06:33:00 +0100 FirstAdminAudience http://www.biblereexamined.com/wiki/tiki-index.php?page=FirstAdminAudience .diffchar { color:red; } +
    + vv 12-21 are written as if in the context of giving a history with a focus on the effect and role of the law of Moses. Verses 13 and 20 then show that the law led to Jews becoming transgressors in order that Christ might be sent to redeem Israel from her transgressions. The approach or style of this historical narrative appears to be one toward a non-Jewish audience. If the audience had been Jewish, for example, this portion of chapter 5 would say that "Moses was sent to you with the law." Maybe if the audience were a mix of Jew and gentile, then Paul may write in the generalized sense as done in vv. 12-21.
    ]]>     Tue, 09 Feb 2010 04:05:05 +0100     BookNotes http://www.biblereexamined.com/wiki/tiki-index.php?page=BookNotes .diffchar { color:red; } +
    +
    +

    Paul's Rhetoric in its Contexts — Thomas H. Tobin, SJ

    + The book has a section titled Literary Cues in Romans pg 84.
    + Literary cues in Romans provide guidance for understanding its structure. AS ementioned earlier, when one reas the main body of Romans (1:16-11:36) , one cannot but be struck by the differences in style between different sections of the text. ON the one hand, some sections read like expositions or dexplanations of a topic. Their tone is calm and note explicilty argmentative. Romans 1:18--32, 3:21-26, 5:1-21, and 8:1-30 are of this sort. On the other hand, other sections of Romans are quite argumentative or polemical in style. Romans 2:1-3:20,m 3:27-4:25, 6:1-7:25, and 8:31-11:36 are of this sort; these sections are marked by various literary devices that create a much livelier, more engaged , and argumentative tone.15
    + Note 15 For explanations of many of these terms, see R. Dean Anderson, Jr., Glossary of Greek Rhetorical Terms Connected to Methods of Argumentation, Figures, and Tropes from Anaximenes to Quintilian (Louvain: πeeters, 2000); and Heinrich Lausberg, handbook of Literary Rhetoric: A Foundation for Literary Study(ed. David E. Orton and R. Dean Anderson; trans. Matthew T. Bliss, Annemiek Jansen, and David E. Orton; Leiden: Brill, 1998)
    +
    ]]>     Sun, 08 Nov 2009 04:35:10 +0100     Rom_Issues http://www.biblereexamined.com/wiki/tiki-index.php?page=Rom_Issues .diffchar { color:red; } -
  • Links to Issues-
  • First Admin's View-
  • Israel+
    +

    Bibliography

    + This is to add some book notes: BookNotes
    ]]> Sun, 08 Nov 2009 02:16:25 +0100 HomePage http://www.biblereexamined.com/wiki/tiki-index.php?page=HomePage .diffchar { color:red; } - Copyright (c) 2007-2008 by Mike Whitney. Follow Copyright Policy link for specifics.
    + Copyright (c) 2007-2009 by Mike Whitney. Follow Copyright Policy link for specifics.
    ]]>     Thu, 08 Oct 2009 00:07:59 +0100     Rom_Introduction http://www.biblereexamined.com/wiki/tiki-index.php?page=Rom_Introduction .diffchar { color:red; } -
  • First Admin's View ...-
  • Hellenist reading-
  • Links to Other Introductions ...- For introduction to FirstAdmin href="tiki-editpage.php?page=FirstAdmin" title="Create page: FirstAdmin" class="wiki wikinew">? see <a title="FirstAdminRom0Intro" href="tiki-index.php?page=FirstAdminRom0Intro" class="wiki ">FirstAdminRom0Introa>
    + For introduction see Rom0Intro" href="tiki-index.php?page=FirstAdminRom0Intro" class="wiki ">FirstAdminRom0Intro /> /><br />
    Much confus    ion has occurred in efforts to understand the letter to the Romans. But its content must have been reasonably expected to be understood by the original audience. A big reason the audience was able to follow Paul's arguments and the general flow of the Romans letter was because Paul made contact with the hearts and minds of the Roman believers. These believers wanted to be decent followers of Christ but had lost there way – this was at least the view of Paul as reflected in the letter.
    ]]> Mon, 04 May 2009 07:18:42 +0100 FirstAdminRom0Intro http://www.biblereexamined.com/wiki/tiki-index.php?page=FirstAdminRom0Intro .diffchar { color:red; } - The questions raise in the letter were essentially beliefs of the Gentiles formed into questions.
    + The questions raised in the letter were essentially beliefs of the Gentiles formed into questions.
    ]]>     Mon, 04 May 2009 07:15:32 +0100     HyperGraceDoctrine http://www.biblereexamined.com/wiki/tiki-index.php?page=HyperGraceDoctrine .diffchar { color:red; } - GraceDoctrine" href="tiki-index.php?page=HyperGraceDoctrine" class="wiki ">HyperGraceDoctrine
    + Hyper Grace Doctrine
    ]]> Mon, 27 Apr 2009 03:16:36 +0100 Rom06_Issues http://www.biblereexamined.com/wiki/tiki-index.php?page=Rom06_Issues .diffchar { color:red; } -
  • First Admin's view ...-
  • Article by Bob Deffinbaugh , Th.M-
  • Other Issues By Links ...- The question of "shall we continue in sin that grace may abound?" should be interpreted as Paul's response to the typical Roman believers' beliefs. The behavior of the Romans seemed to be one of making grace an excuse for sin. Such attitude plausibly formed as a reaction to the persecution they were under (Rom 5:1-3), a persecution by the government (Rom 12:12-21, Rom 13:1-5).
    + The question of "shall we continue in sin that grace may abound?" should be interpreted as Paul's response to the typical Roman believers' doctrine about sinning for the increase of grace. The behavior of the Romans seemed to be one of making grace an excuse for sin. Such attitude plausibly formed as a reaction to the persecution they were under (Rom 5:1-3), a persecution by the government (Rom 12:12-21, Rom 13:1-5).
    +
    + More about the HyperGraceDoctrine.
    ]]> Mon, 27 Apr 2009 02:43:35 +0100